Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31521103›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2019

Preferential activation of small cutaneous fibers through small pin electrode also depends on the shape of a long duration electrical current.

Rosa Hugosdottir, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Ole Kæseler Andersen, Thordur Helgason, Lars Arendt-Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosa HugosdottirCenter of Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. rosahugos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8025-3021
Carsten Dahl MørchCenter of Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. cdahl@hst.aau.dk.
Ole Kæseler AndersenCenter of Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thordur HelgasonInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Health Technology Center, School of Engineering and Science, Reykjavik University, Menntavegur 1, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Lars Arendt-NielsenCenter of Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKReykjavík University · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical stimulation is widely used in experimental pain research but it lacks selectivity towards small nociceptive fibers. When using standard surface patch electrodes and rectangular pulses, large fibers are activated at a lower threshold than small fibers. Pin electrodes have been designed for overcoming this problem by providing a higher current density in the upper epidermis where the small nociceptive fibers mainly terminate. At perception threshold level, pin electrode stimuli are rather selectively activating small nerve fibers and are perceived as painful, but for high current intensity, which is usually needed to evoke sufficient pain levels, large fibers are likely co-activated. Long duration current has been shown to elevate the threshold of large fibers by the mechanism of accommodation. However, it remains unclear whether the mechanism of accommodation in large fibers can be utilized to activate small fibers even more selectively by combining pin electrode stimulation with a long duration pulse.

resultsIn this study, perception thresholds were determined for a patch- and a pin electrode for different pulse shapes of long duration. The perception threshold ratio between the two different electrodes was calculated to estimate the ability of the pulse shapes to preferentially activate small fibers. The perception threshold ratios were compared between stimulation pulses of 5- and 50 ms durations and shapes of: exponential increase, linear increase, bounded exponential, and rectangular. Qualitative pain perception was evaluated for all pulse shapes delivered at 10 times perception threshold. The results showed a higher perception threshold ratio for long duration 50 ms pulses than for 5 ms pulses. The highest perception threshold ratio was found for the 50 ms, bounded exponential pulse shape. Results furthermore revealed different strength-duration relation between the bounded exponential- and rectangular pulse shapes. Pin electrode stimulation at high intensity was mainly described as "stabbing", "shooting", and "sharp".

conclusionThese results indicate that long duration pulses with a bounded exponential increase preferentially activate the small nociceptive fibers with a pin electrode and concurrently cause elevated threshold of large non-nociceptive fibers with patch electrodes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedElectric StimulationElectrodesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersSensory ThresholdsSkinTime FactorsYoung AdultElectrical pulse shapesElectrical stimulationLarge fiber accommodationPatch electrodePin electrodeSmall fiber activation

Identifiers

PMID31521103
PMCPMC6744690
OpenAlexW2973031595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.