Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520923›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting.

Alexandra M Mellis, Sarah E Snider, Harshawardhan U Deshpande, Stephen M LaConte, Warren K Bickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Is episodic future thinking effective in mitigating the influence of time preference in time trade-off?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Behavioral economic cigarette demand among individuals who smoke with and without obesity.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra M MellisGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. Electronic address: ammellis@vt.edu.
Sarah E SniderAddiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA. Electronic address: sniderse@vtc.vt.edu.
Harshawardhan U DeshpandeBiomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. Electronic address: harsh87@vt.edu.
Stephen M LaConteStephen M. LaConte, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. Electronic address: slaconte@vtc.vt.edu.
Warren K Bickel540-526-2088, Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, 24016, USA. Electronic address: wkbickel@vtc.vt.edu.

Funding

The Repair of Self Control in Alcohol Dependence: Working Memory & Real Time fMRIR01AA021529 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, LACONTE, STEPHEN M · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelay discounting, or the preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later rewards, has been associated with alcohol use disorder and problem drinking. Episodic future thinking has been suggested as an intervention to address steep delay discounting. In the present study, we examined the effect of up to six consecutive sessions of episodic future thinking.

methodsRepeated, within-subject data were collected from current and recent problem drinkers (n = 50) over six sessions. Linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate effects of repeated sessions and manipulations. Participants completed episodic future thinking interviews at up to six sessions, in which they generated personalized future events. Participants also engaged with cues of scarcity. At each session, participants completed three delay discounting tasks under: a no-cue baseline condition, a future cue condition, and a scarcity cue condition.

resultsDelay discounting in the no cue condition did not change over time. Discounting rates were reduced in the future cue condition, and these effects grew larger with repeated sessions. In the scarcity condition, discounting rates were slightly higher, with no effect of repeated sessions.

conclusionsEpisodic future thinking reduced delay discounting rate while future cues were presented, and these effects grew larger with repeated sessions. This suggests that repeated episodic future thinking may cumulatively potentiate repair of excessive preference for immediate reward.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingForecastingMemory, EpisodicAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCuesFemaleHumansMaleRewardThinkingYoung AdultAlcoholAlcohol use disorderDelay discountingDose effectsEpisodic future thinkingImpulsivityPractice

Identifiers

PMID31520923
PMCPMC6878183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.