Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520767›Full record

ArticlePractical radiation oncology

Communicating the External Beam Radiation Experience (CEBRE): Perceived Benefits of a Graphic Narrative Patient Education Tool.

Ritu Arya, Tomoko Ichikawa, Brian Callender, Olivia Schultz, Marina DePablo, Kira Novak, Shanyanyan Li, Apoorva Shenoy, Andrea Everman, Sarah Braunstein and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Navigating Radiation Therapy During COVID-19 Using YouTube as a Source of Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ritu AryaDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tomoko IchikawaInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Brian CallenderDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Olivia SchultzPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Marina DePabloUniversity of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Kira NovakInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Shanyanyan LiInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Apoorva ShenoyInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrea EvermanInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Sarah BraunsteinInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Isabel DecInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Sonia LalaInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Yachu FengInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Laura BiltzInstitute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Anne R McCallDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel W GoldenDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: dgolden@radonc.uchicago.edu.

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent radiation oncology patient education materials exceed national readability recommendations. A graphic narrative educational tool, the Communicating the External Beam Radiation Experience (CEBRE) discussion guide, was developed to facilitate patient-provider communication. A pilot study evaluated perceived benefits of CEBRE for patients and physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CEBRE was designed through a collaboration between physicians and designers. Designers interviewed patients, family members, and the clinical team. Interviews were coded for themes, leading to the design principles that drove the design of CEBRE, including a graphic narrative component. CEBRE explains the radiation therapy care path. Readability was measured using the Flesch-Kincaid test. Patients receiving radiation therapy or in follow-up and practicing radiation oncologists reviewed CEBRE and completed independent surveys. Each survey included modified versions of the Systems Usability Score (SUS) and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) short form, along with questions unique to CEBRE. Likert-type scores are reported as median (interquartile range).

resultsCEBRE scores at a 5.4 Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Thirty-four patients and 15 radiation oncologists completed surveys. Patients had completed a high school/general equivalency degree (18%), a 2-year degree or some college (50%), or at least 4 years of college (32%). Patient and physician responses were concordant. On a scale of 1 to 5 for modified SUS and 1 to 4 for modified STAI ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") the SUS scores were 4 (4-5) and 4 (4-5) and STAI scores were 3 (3-4) and 3 (3-3.5) for patients and providers, respectively. This indicates CEBRE is usable and would decrease anxiety. Compared with text, the graphic narrative component of CEBRE was rated as "quite helpful" (4 [4-5]).

conclusionsCEBRE, a graphic narrative education tool developed through a novel collaboration between designers and radiation therapy stakeholders, is accessible for patients and practical to facilitate patient-provider discussion. Perceived benefits demonstrating high usability and the potential to decrease patient anxiety warrant further prospective investigation of CEBRE in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiation OncologyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31520767
PMCPMC7064379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.