Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520469›Full record

ReviewEcoSal Plus2019

Control of the

Stewart G Gardner, William R McCleary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EcoSal Plus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of stress-induced small proteins inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli glucokinase and insights into phosphate binding.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disentangling the Regulatory Response ofACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stewart G GardnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Emporia State University, Emporia, KS 66801.
William R McClearyMicrobiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus is required for many biological molecules and essential functions, including DNA replication, transcription of RNA, protein translation, posttranslational modifications, and numerous facets of metabolism. In order to maintain the proper level of phosphate for these processes, many bacteria adapt to changes in environmental phosphate levels. The mechanisms for sensing phosphate levels and adapting to changes have been extensively studied for multiple organisms. The phosphate response of

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialRegulonEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsPhosphatesPhosphate Transport ProteinsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsEscherichia coli ProteinsPhosphatesPhosphate Transport ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31520469
PMCPMC11573284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.