Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520280›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2020

Loop diuretic resistance complicating acute heart failure.

Zachary L Cox, Jeffrey M Testani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary L CoxDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Burton Health Science Center, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy, One University Park Drive, Nashville, TN, 37204, USA. Zachary.l.cox@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-0146
Jeffrey M TestaniDivision of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lipscomb University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute heart failure hospitalizations complicated by diuretic resistance are associated with worse outcomes. Yet, quantification of the frequency and accompanying risk from loop diuretic resistance is limited by the absence of a comprehensive definition with universal clinical application. Herein, we outline limitations of the current metrics used to identify and define diuretic resistance. We discuss the best available methods to identify and prognosticate outcomes in diuretic resistance. We propose a mechanism-based classification system of diuretic resistance by anatomical location as follows: pre-nephron resistance, pre-loop of Henle resistance, loop of Henle resistance, and post-loop of Henle resistance. Within this paradigm, we compare and contrast historical beliefs of resistance mechanisms with current literature specific to patients with heart failure. We recommend a treatment pathway to restore diuretic efficacy with a literature review of the various combination diuretic strategies and ongoing clinical trials that may impact current best practices.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAcute DiseaseDiureticsHeart FailureHumansInfusions, IntravenousPractice Guidelines as TopicSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsDiureticsSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsAcute heart failureCombination diuretic therapyCombination nephron blockadeDiureticDiuretic resistanceHeart failureLoop diuretic

Identifiers

PMID31520280
OpenAlexW2972839323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.