Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520183›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2020

Do Peer Recovery Specialists Improve Outcomes for Individuals with Substance Use Disorder in an Integrative Primary Care Setting? A Program Evaluation.

Travis A Cos, Archana Bodas LaPollo, Mara Aussendorf, Jason M Williams, Kimberly Malayter, David S Festinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Impact of Peer-Based Recovery Support Services: Mediating Factors of Client Outcomes.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Travis A CosPublic Health Management Corporation, Research & Evaluation Group, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Travis.cos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-3702
Archana Bodas LaPolloPublic Health Management Corporation, Research & Evaluation Group, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mara AussendorfPublic Health Management Corporation, Research & Evaluation Group, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason M WilliamsPublic Health Management Corporation, Specialized Health Services, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kimberly MalayterMerakey, Erdenheim, PA, USA.
David S FestingerDepartment of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) combine their personal experiences with substance use and recovery with clinical skills to support patients in treatment for or recovery from substance use. This paper provides evaluation findings from a SAMHSA-funded program that integrated a PRS team into a primary care clinic to assess the efficacy of PRS support on patients' substance use, healthcare involvement, and criminal justice involvement. PRSs provided a range of services to patients with histories of incarceration and substance use, including facilitating support groups, providing one-on-one individualized support, and navigating services. Data were collected from PRS-supported patients at intake, discharge, and 6 months post-intake. Results revealed reductions in the percentage of patients using substances in the past 30 days, decreased number of days using alcohol, increased engagement in more medical services after program enrollment, increased school enrollment, and increased rates of employment for PRS-supported patients.

Indexed as

Peer GroupFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew EnglandPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationSpecializationSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeUrban PopulationEvaluationIntegrated primary carePeer recovery specialistsSubstance use recovery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.