Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520177›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Comparative clinical and cost analysis between surgical and non-surgical intervention for knee osteoarthritis.

Luxme Mahendira, Caroline Jones, Angelo Papachristos, James Waddell, Laurence Rubin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Prevalence and risk factors of osteoarthritis in patients at a public hospital in Limpopo province.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Healthcare Utilization and Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms among Urban Older Malaysian.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luxme MahendiraDivision of Rheumatology, Unity Health-Saint Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Bond Wing 3-061, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Caroline JonesMobility Program, Unity Health-Saint Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Angelo PapachristosMobility Program, Unity Health-Saint Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
James WaddellMobility Program, Unity Health-Saint Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Laurence RubinDivision of Rheumatology, Unity Health-Saint Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Bond Wing 3-061, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada. Laurence.Rubin@unityhealth.to.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-5759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the management and costs of osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK), a progressive joint disease due to bone and cartilage degeneration, with significant personal and societal impact.

methodsWe prospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes and quantifiable cumulative direct costs of patients with OAK referred to our multidisciplinary OA program over a two year time period. One hundred thirty-one subjects were assessed. All demonstrated radiographic criteria for moderate to severe OAK. Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII), and change in BMI were recorded and analyzed. Total medical and surgical direct costs for all subjects during the two year time period were determined.

resultsFive patients underwent total joint replacement during the two years of study. Among the group as a whole, a significant overall improvement in WOMAC scores was noted at the two year time point follow-up. After dividing the group into tertiles by baseline WOMAC scores, 46% achieved MCII. Significant weight loss was noted for individuals with baseline BMI of > 30. As all patients were considered "de facto" surgical candidates at referral, an average net savings of $9551.10 of direct costs per patient, or a potential total of $1,203,438.60 for the entire group, could be inferred as a result of medical as opposed to surgical management.

conclusionThese findings support the benefits of multidisciplinary medical management for patients with significant OAK. This approach is clinically beneficial and may provide significant cost savings. Such models of care can substantially improve the long-term outcome of this highly prevalent condition and reduce societal and financial burdens.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceOsteoarthritis, KneeAdvanced clinician practitionerAdvanced practice physcial therapistArthritisComprehensive non-surgical managementHealth economicsModels of careMultidiscplinary medical managementOsteoarthritisTotal knee arthroplastyWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID31520177
PMCPMC6938792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.