Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520174›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Detection of fly artifacts from four species of necrophagous flies on household materials using immunoassays.

David B Rivers, Gregory Cavanagh, Valerie Greisman, Rebecca Brogan, Andrew Schoeffield

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B RiversDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA. drivers@loyola.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6794-7851
Gregory CavanaghDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Valerie GreismanDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Rebecca BroganDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Andrew SchoeffieldDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Loyola University Maryland · US

Funding

National Institute of Justice 2016-DN-BX-0181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An immunoassay was previously developed as a technique to improve methods for detection and analysis of fly artifacts found at crime scenes. The dot blot assay utilized a polyclonal antiserum (anti-md3) based on a unique digestive cathepsin D found in cyclorrhaphous Diptera. In this study, artifacts produced by adults of Calliphora vicina, Cynomya cadaverina, Sarcophaga bullata, and Protophormia terraenovae were examined using the immunoassay to determine if insect-derived stains could be distinguished from a range of human body fluid stains. A lift technique was developed which permitted transfer of fly artifacts from test materials to filter paper for dot blot analyses. All species readily deposited artifacts on all test household materials regardless of diet consumed. Despite differences in texture and porosity of the household materials, artifacts of all species transferred to the filter paper. With all fly species, anti-md3 serum bound to artifacts produced after feeding on semen, blood, feces, urine, and saliva. By contrast, anti-md3 serum did not react with any of the human fluids tested, nor with any of the lifts from household materials not exposed to flies. There was no evidence of false positives with any of the fly species tested, regardless of diet consumed. There was also no indication of false negatives with any of the dot blot assays. These observations suggest that immunoassays using anti-md3 serum performed on a simple lift of suspected fly artifacts can be used effectively as a confirmatory assay to distinguish fly regurgitate and fecal stains from human body fluids.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDipteraForensic EntomologyAnimalsBlood StainsBody FluidsFecesFeeding BehaviorImmune SeraImmunoassaySalivaSemenUrineImmune SeraBloodstainsDigestive artifactsForensic entomologyImmunodetectionInsect stains

Identifiers

PMID31520174
OpenAlexW2972570978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.