Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520146›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Anterior cruciate ligament grafts display differential maturation patterns on magnetic resonance imaging following reconstruction: a systematic review.

Joseph A Panos, Kate E Webster, Timothy E Hewett

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph A PanosMayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-0896
Kate E WebsterSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Timothy E HewettDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA. Hewett.timothy@mayo.edu.

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
Neuromuscular Intervention Targeted to Mechanisms of ACL Load in Female AthletesR01AR055563 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BATES, NATHANIEL ANDREW, KRYCH, AARON · 2008 to 2022
$5.9M
Medical Scientist Traning Program at Mayo ClinicT32GM065841 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMANN, SCOTT H, SCHIMMENTI, LISA A · 2003 to 2022
$5.8M
Multi-faceted Approach to Modeling ACL Injury MechanismsR01AR056259 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEWETT, TIMOTHY E · 2009 to 2017
$4.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055563NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056259NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR056259NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR55563NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950NIAMS NIH HHS T32AR56950NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe appearance of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is related to graft maturity and mechanical strength after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Accordingly, the purpose of this review was to quantitatively analyze reports of serial MRI of the ACL graft during the first year following ACLR; the hypothesis tested was that normalized MRI signal intensity would differ significantly by ACL graft type, graft source, and postoperative time.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched for all studies published prior to June 2018 reporting MRI signal intensity of the ACL graft at multiple time points during the first postoperative year after ACLR. Signal intensity values at 6 and 12 months post-ACLR were normalized to initial measurements and analyzed using a least-squares regression model to study the independent variables of postoperative time, graft type, and graft source on the normalized MRI signal intensity.

resultsAn effect of graft type (P = 0.001) with interactions of graft type * time (P = 0.012) and graft source * time (P = 0.001) were observed. Post hoc analyses revealed greater predicted normalized MRI signal intensity of patellar tendon autografts than both hamstring (P = 0.008) and hamstring with remnant preservation (P = 0.001) autografts at postoperative month 12.

conclusionMRI signal varies with graft type, graft source, and time after ACLR. Enhanced graft maturity during the first postoperative year was associated with hamstring autografts, with and without remnant preservation. Serial MRI imaging during the first postoperative year may be clinically useful to identify biologically or mechanically deficient ACL grafts at risk for failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAutograftsHamstring TendonsHumansPatellar LigamentPostoperative PeriodTransplantation, AutologousAnterior cruciate ligamentLigamentizationMagnetic resonance imagingSignal–noise-quotient

Identifiers

PMID31520146
PMCPMC7067650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.