Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31520117›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2019

Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

JoAnn McGee, Peggy B Nelson, Julia B Ponder, Jeffrey Marr, Patrick Redig, Edward J Walsh

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

JoAnn McGeeDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and the Center for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota, 164 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. mcgeej@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2207-4660
Peggy B NelsonDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and the Center for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota, 164 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Julia B PonderThe Raptor Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Jeffrey MarrSt. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
Patrick RedigThe Raptor Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Edward J WalshDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and the Center for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota, 164 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision with wind turbines is a conservation concern for eagles with population abundance implications. The development of acoustic alerting technologies to deter eagles from entering hazardous air spaces is a potentially significant mitigation strategy to diminish associated morbidity and mortality risks. As a prelude to the engineering of deterrence technologies, auditory function was assessed in bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), as well as in red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to a comprehensive battery of clicks and tone bursts varying in level and frequency were acquired to evaluate response thresholds, as well as suprathreshold response characteristics of wave I of the ABR, which represents the compound potential of the VIII cranial nerve. Sensitivity curves exhibited an asymmetric convex shape similar to those of other avian species, response latencies decreased exponentially with increasing stimulus level and response amplitudes grew with level in an orderly manner. Both species were responsive to a frequency band at least four octaves wide, with a most sensitive frequency of 2 kHz, and a high-frequency limit of approximately 5.7 kHz in bald eagles and 8 kHz in red-tailed hawks. Findings reported here provide a framework within which acoustic alerting signals might be developed.

Indexed as

AnimalsEaglesEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHawksHearingAuditory brainstem responseEaglesEvoked potentialsHawksHearing

Identifiers

PMID31520117
OpenAlexW2973063158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.