ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Outcome of pterygium excision after various surgical techniques-is excision with simple conjunctival closure still lege artis?]
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Modified mini-SLET for treatment of complex cases in pterygium surgery].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation Combined with Closure of Tenon Capsule and Bulbar Conjunctival Space in the Treatment of Primary Pterygium.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- [Pterygium: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- [The use of mitomycin C in pterygium surgery].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Article
- [Should mitomycin C be used routinely in pterygium surgery?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no consensus about the best method for pterygium excision. Variable recurrence rates have been reported in the literature depending on the surgical technique.
objectiveTo evaluate the postoperative outcome after pterygium excision depending on the preoperative extent of the pterygium and the surgical method. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 109 patients (72 men, 37 women) who underwent 109 pterygium surgeries were retrospectively analyzed. In 87 cases postoperative data over a 5-year follow-up period were available. Besides recording the preoperative extent of the pterygium the functional outcome was analyzed and recurrence rates of the various techniques by simple excision with primary conjunctival closure (SE), conjunctival autograft (BHT) and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) were compared.
resultsOverall, recurrence was noted in 21 %. The recurrence rate of SE was 20 %. After BHT fewer recurrences (11 %) were seen than after AMT (39 %). After the intraoperative use of mitomycin C (MMC) more recurrences (31 %) occurred than without the use of MMC (17%). In 45 % of the cases delayed recurrence occurred after the first postoperative year.
conclusionIn our opinion the method of SE is not obsolete. Good results can be achieved with SE in pterygia with a small extent. The lowest recurrence rate was seen after BHT; therefore, BHT is the method of choice in general and especially for larger pterygia. The higher recurrence rate after intraoperative use of MMC is probably caused by selection bias. Regular follow-up examinations are required beyond the first postoperative year for timely detection of delayed recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31520116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.