ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Masquerade lacrimal duct stenosis: prevalence of lacrimal sac tumors].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Lacrimal Sac Initially Suspected to Represent a Sinonasal Malignancy 16 Years After Dacryocystorhinostomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ectopic dacryops mimicking a lacrimal sac tumor: A case report and literature review.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Primary lacrimal sac lymphoma: a case-based retrospective study in a Chinese population.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Rare transitional cell carcinoma of the lacrimal sac.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2020Article
- Ectopic lacrimal gland in the lacrimal sac mimicking tumour: literature review.BMJ case reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumors of the lacrimal sac are a rare entity. Malignancies are often associated with a high mortality rate. Lacrimal sac tumors often present as lacrimal duct stenosis with dacryocystitis and are often only diagnosed after an intraoperative biopsy. The aim of this study was a retrospective analysis of all cases with lacrimal sac tumors, which presented with a lacrimal duct stenosis at this medical center in the past 10 years.
methodsAll patients who were treated by external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the University Medical Center Münster during the period January 2009-December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of a lacrimal sac tumor. Symptoms, clinical and histopathological findings, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as well as long-term follow-up were analyzed.
resultsA total number of 878 patients underwent an external DCR at the University Medical Center Münster during the study period. Of these patients 13 were diagnosed with a lacrimal sac tumor and included 9 malignant lymphomas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 oncocytic adenoma and 1 transitional cell papilloma.
conclusionNeoplasms of the lacrimal sac can masquerade as lacrimal duct stenosis or dacryocystitis and must be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases with an atypical clinical course. A lacrimal sac biopsy during an (external) DCR with subsequent histopathological examination is strongly recommended in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.