ArticleIntensive care medicine2019
Less is more: catecholamine-sparing strategies in septic shock.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reduced exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension to reduce mortality in critically ill people aged 65 and over: the 65 RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Management of post-resuscitation vasoplegic shock: targets, strategies and outcomes.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Beyond the heart: a review exploring non-cardiovascular effects of vasoactive agents.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Timing of vasoactive agents and corticosteroid initiation in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2022Review
- Vasopressor Choice and Timing in Vasodilatory Shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Review
- Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Focus on sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31520103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.