Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Mimicking in-vivo exposures to drug combinations in-vitro: anti-tuberculosis drugs in lung lesions and the hollow fiber model of infection.

Frank Kloprogge, Robert Hammond, Karin Kipper, Stephen H Gillespie, Oscar Della Pasqua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Using Hollow Fiber to Model Treatment of Antimicrobial-Resistant Organisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Culture-Free Enumeration ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  10. Field Grand Challenge Frontiers in Antibiotics.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank KloproggeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom. f.kloprogge@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-4559
Robert HammondSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Karin KipperAnalytical Services International Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-8993
Stephen H GillespieSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Oscar Della PasquaClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Group, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University of St Andrews · GBThe George Institute for Global Health · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014534/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we evaluate protocol requirements to mimic therapeutically relevant drug concentrations at the site of infection (i.e. lung lesion) in an in-vitro hollow fibre model of infection using pulmonary tuberculosis as a paradigm. Steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles in plasma, lung tissue and lung lesion homogenate were simulated for isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide and moxifloxacin. An R-shiny User Interface was developed to support conversion of in-vivo pharmacokinetic C

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAntitubercular AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsHumansMycobacteriumTissue DistributionTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID31519935
PMCPMC6744479
OpenAlexW2973219014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.