Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519932›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Suitability of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for transcriptome sequencing of the canine prostate.

H Thiemeyer, L Taher, J T Schille, L Harder, S O Hungerbuehler, R Mischke, M Hewicker-Trautwein, Z Kiełbowicz, B Brenig, E Schütz and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Prostate Gland in Neutered Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H ThiemeyerSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-2711
L TaherDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
J T SchilleSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
L HarderSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
S O HungerbuehlerSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
R MischkeSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
M Hewicker-TrautweinInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Z KiełbowiczDepartment and Clinic of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
B BrenigUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
E SchützChronix Biomedical, Göttingen, Germany.
J BeckChronix Biomedical, Göttingen, Germany.
H Murua EscobarSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
I NolteSmall Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. Ingo.Nolte@tiho-hannover.de.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) biopsy is a widely used minimally invasive sampling procedure for cytological diagnosis. This study investigates the feasibility of using US-FNA samples for both cytological diagnosis and whole transcriptome RNA-sequencing analysis (RNA-Seq), with the ultimate aim of improving canine prostate cancer management. The feasibility of the US-FNA procedure was evaluated intra vitam on 43 dogs. Additionally, aspirates from 31 euthanised dogs were collected for standardising the procedure. Each aspirate was separated into two subsamples: for cytology and RNA extraction. Additional prostate tissue samples served as control for RNA quantity and quality evaluation, and differential expression analysis. The US-FNA sampling procedure was feasible in 95% of dogs. RNA isolation of US-FNA samples was successfully performed using phenol-chloroform extraction. The extracted RNA of 56% of a subset of US-FNA samples met the quality requirements for RNA-Seq. Expression analysis revealed that only 153 genes were exclusively differentially expressed between non-malignant US-FNAs and tissues. Moreover, only 36 differentially expressed genes were associated with the US-FNA sampling technique and unrelated to the diagnosis. Furthermore, the gene expression profiles clearly distinguished between non-malignant and malignant samples. This proves US-FNA to be useful for molecular profiling.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsBiomarkersDogsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationExome SequencingImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31519932
PMCPMC6744464
OpenAlexW2972602288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.