Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519879›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Comparative fitness analysis of D-cycloserine resistant mutants reveals both fitness-neutral and high-fitness cost genotypes.

Dimitrios Evangelopoulos, Gareth A Prosser, Angela Rodgers, Belinda M Dagg, Bhagwati Khatri, Mei Mei Ho, Maximiliano G Gutierrez, Teresa Cortes, Luiz Pedro S de Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene evolutionary trajectories inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios EvangelopoulosMycobacterial Metabolism and Antibiotic Research Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-7576
Gareth A ProsserMycobacterial Metabolism and Antibiotic Research Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Angela RodgersMycobacterial Metabolism and Antibiotic Research Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Belinda M DaggBacteriology Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (MHRA-NIBSC), Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts, EN6 3QG, UK.
Bhagwati KhatriBacteriology Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (MHRA-NIBSC), Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts, EN6 3QG, UK.
Mei Mei HoBacteriology Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (MHRA-NIBSC), Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts, EN6 3QG, UK.
Maximiliano G GutierrezHost-Pathogen Interactions in Tuberculosis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-0337
Teresa CortesDepartment of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Luiz Pedro S de CarvalhoMycobacterial Metabolism and Antibiotic Research Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK. luiz.carvalho@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2875-4552
The Francis Crick Institute · GBNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001060Medical Research Council FC001060Wellcome Trust FC001060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug resistant infections represent one of the most challenging medical problems of our time. D-cycloserine is an antibiotic used for six decades without significant appearance and dissemination of antibiotic resistant strains, making it an ideal model compound to understand what drives resistance evasion. We therefore investigated why Mycobacterium tuberculosis fails to become resistant to D-cycloserine. To address this question, we employed a combination of bacterial genetics, genomics, biochemistry and fitness analysis in vitro, in macrophages and in mice. Altogether, our results suggest that the ultra-low rate of emergence of D-cycloserine resistance mutations is the dominant biological factor delaying the appearance of clinical resistance to this antibiotic. Furthermore, we also identified potential compensatory mechanisms able to minimize the severe fitness costs of primary D-cycloserine resistance conferring mutations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntitubercularBlotting, WesternCycloserineDrug Resistance, BacterialGenotypeHumansMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonocytesMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisAntibiotics, AntitubercularCycloserine

Identifiers

PMID31519879
PMCPMC6744398
OpenAlexW2972495958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.