Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519823›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

A Target-Detecting Visual Neuron in the Dragonfly Locks on to Selectively Attended Targets.

Benjamin H Lancer, Bernard J E Evans, Joseph M Fabian, David C O'Carroll, Steven D Wiederman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oscillations in the central brain ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin H LancerAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 5005, benjamin.lancer@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9339-7355
Bernard J E EvansAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 5005.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-3775
Joseph M FabianAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 5005.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-7581
David C O'CarrollDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden 223 62.ORCID 0000-0002-2352-4320
Steven D WiedermanAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 5005.ORCID 0000-0002-0902-803X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual world projects a complex and rapidly changing image onto the retina of many animal species. This presents computational challenges for those animals reliant on visual processing to provide an accurate representation of the world. One such challenge is parsing a visual scene for the most salient targets, such as the selection of prey amid a swarm. The ability to selectively prioritize processing of some stimuli over others is known as 'selective attention'. We recently identified a dragonfly visual neuron called 'Centrifugal Small Target Motion Detector 1' (CSTMD1) that exhibits selective attention when presented with multiple, equally salient targets. Here we conducted

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionMaleNeuronsOdonataPhotic StimulationVision, OcularVisual Perceptioninsect visionpredictive gain modulationprimingselective attentiontarget detectionwinner-takes-all

Identifiers

PMID31519823
PMCPMC6807275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.