ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2019
Experimental models and tools to tackle glioblastoma.
Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines - a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Review
- Single cell proteomic analysis defines discrete neutrophil functional states in human glioblastoma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A human iPSC-based neural spheroid platform for modelling glioblastoma infiltration using high-content imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel organoid model retaining the glioma microenvironment for personalized drug screening and therapeutic evaluation.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Modeling Glioblastoma with Brain Organoids: New Frontiers in Oncology and Space Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapies and glioma stem cells in glioblastoma: a systematic review of current challenges and research directions.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, a brain tumor oncoprotein (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Human stem cell models to unravel brain cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Review
- Targeting Retinaldehyde Dehydrogenases to Enhance Temozolomide Therapy in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Glioma Stem Cells-Features for New Therapy Design.Cancers · 2024Review
- An improved F98 glioblastoma rat model to evaluate novel treatment strategies incorporating the standard of care.PloS one · 2024Article
- The ins and outs of microglial cells in brain health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Combining organotypic tissue culture with light-sheet microscopy (OTCxLSFM) to study glioma invasion.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- Synergistic effect of doxorubicin lauroyl hydrazone derivative delivered by α-tocopherol succinate micelles for the treatment of glioblastoma.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023Article
- Preclinical Models and Technologies in Glioblastoma Research: Evolution, Current State, and Future Avenues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Low expression of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) R132H is associated with advanced pathological features in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Radiomics for characterization of the glioma immune microenvironment.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the deadliest human cancers. Despite increasing knowledge of the genetic and epigenetic changes that underlie tumour initiation and growth, the prognosis for GBM patients remains dismal. Genome analysis has failed to lead to success in the clinic. Fresh approaches are needed that can stimulate new discoveries across all levels: cell-intrinsic mechanisms (transcriptional/epigenetic and metabolic), cell-cell signalling, niche and microenvironment, systemic signals, immune regulation, and tissue-level physical forces. GBMs are inherently extremely challenging: tumour detection occurs too late, and cells infiltrate widely, hiding in quiescent states behind the blood-brain barrier. The complexity of the brain tissue also provides varied and complex microenvironments that direct cancer cell fates. Phenotypic heterogeneity is therefore superimposed onto pervasive genetic heterogeneity. Despite this bleak outlook, there are reasons for optimism. A myriad of complementary, and increasingly sophisticated, experimental approaches can now be used across the research pipeline, from simple reductionist models devised to delineate molecular and cellular mechanisms, to complex animal models required for preclinical testing of new therapeutic approaches. No single model can cover the breadth of unresolved questions. This Review therefore aims to guide investigators in choosing the right model for their question. We also discuss the recent convergence of two key technologies: human stem cell and cancer stem cell culture, as well as CRISPR/Cas tools for precise genome manipulations. New functional genetic approaches in tailored models will likely fuel new discoveries, new target identification and new therapeutic strategies to tackle GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.