Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519683›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of proximal hamstrings avulsions: study protocol.

Elsa Pihl, Målfrid Holen Kristoffersen, Anne-Mari Rosenlund, Sofia Laszlo, Mida Berglöf, Eva Ribom, Karl Eriksson, Frede Frihagen, Ville M Mattila, Jörg Schilcher and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03311997 (The Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Clinical Trial - Nonoperative Treatment Compared With Suture Anchor Reinsertion of Proximal Hamstrings Avulsions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03311997 nacompletednot on this map

The Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Clinical Trial - Nonoperative Treatment Compared With Suture Anchor Reinsertion of Proximal Hamstrings Avulsions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled216ConditionsHamstring Tendon InjuryArmsSurgical reattachment of hamstring tendons
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Return to Play.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Elsa PihlKarolinska Institutet Danderyds Sjukhus, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden elsa.pihl@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-6721
Målfrid Holen KristoffersenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anne-Mari RosenlundDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sofia LaszloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mida BerglöfKarolinska Institutet Danderyds Sjukhus, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva RibomDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karl ErikssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frede FrihagenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ville M MattilaDepartment of Orthopeadics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland, Tampere, Finland.
Jörg SchilcherDepartment of Orthopeadic Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden.
Martin EklundKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Greta SnellmanDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mikael SkorpilDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof SköldenbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl Johan HedbeckKarolinska Institutet Danderyds Sjukhus, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kenneth JonssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University Hospital · SEOslo University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOLinköping University Hospital · SETampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions is controversial. While several trials have investigated the outcome for patients treated surgically, there is today no prospective trial comparing operative treatment with non-operative treatment. This protocol describes the design for the proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-the first randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative treatment for proximal hamstring avulsions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PHACT is a multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted across Sweden, Norway and Finland. Eligible patients (60 participants/treatment arm) with a proximal hamstring avulsion of at least two of three tendons will be randomised to either operative or non-operative treatment. Participants allocated to surgery will undergo reinsertion of the tendons with suture anchors. The rehabilitation programme will be the same for both treatment groups. When patient or surgeon equipoise for treatment alternatives cannot be reached and randomisation therefore is not possible, patients will be invited to participate in a parallel observational non-randomised cohort. The primary outcome will be the patient-reported outcome measure Perth hamstring assessment tool at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include the Lower Extremity Functional Score, physical performance and muscle strength tests, patient satisfaction and MR imaging. Data analysis will be blinded and intention-to-treat analysis will be preformed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethical Committee of Uppsala University (DNR: 2017-170) and by the Norwegian ethical board (REC: 2017/1911). The study will be conducted in agreement with the Helsinki declaration. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03311997.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentHamstring MusclesOrthopedic ProceduresTendon InjuriesTendonsAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMuscle StrengthPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of Functionhamstringhamstring tendonsMRImuscle strengthpatient-reported outcome meassurerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31519683
PMCPMC6747659
OpenAlexW2972375324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.