ArticleBMJ open2019
The proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of proximal hamstrings avulsions: study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03311997 (The Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Clinical Trial - Nonoperative Treatment Compared With Suture Anchor Reinsertion of Proximal Hamstrings Avulsions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Clinical Trial - Nonoperative Treatment Compared With Suture Anchor Reinsertion of Proximal Hamstrings Avulsions
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Back in stride: patient perspectives on operative and nonoperative treatment and recovery after acute proximal hamstring avulsions - a qualitative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Initial Tendon Retraction is Associated with Muscle Degeneration After Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Hamstring Avulsions.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Sciatic Nerve Compression after a Chronic Proximal Hamstring Tear: A Report of Two Cases and a Narrative Review of the Literature.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Increasing incidence of surgically treated hamstring injuries: a nationwide registry study in Sweden between 2001 and 2020.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Article
- No difference in clinical outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of minimally retracted proximal hamstring ruptures.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Return to Play.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- Predictive Factors Influencing Functional Results After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Avulsion Surgery: A Patient-Reported Outcome Study After 227 Operations From a Single Center.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions is controversial. While several trials have investigated the outcome for patients treated surgically, there is today no prospective trial comparing operative treatment with non-operative treatment. This protocol describes the design for the proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-the first randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative treatment for proximal hamstring avulsions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PHACT is a multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted across Sweden, Norway and Finland. Eligible patients (60 participants/treatment arm) with a proximal hamstring avulsion of at least two of three tendons will be randomised to either operative or non-operative treatment. Participants allocated to surgery will undergo reinsertion of the tendons with suture anchors. The rehabilitation programme will be the same for both treatment groups. When patient or surgeon equipoise for treatment alternatives cannot be reached and randomisation therefore is not possible, patients will be invited to participate in a parallel observational non-randomised cohort. The primary outcome will be the patient-reported outcome measure Perth hamstring assessment tool at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include the Lower Extremity Functional Score, physical performance and muscle strength tests, patient satisfaction and MR imaging. Data analysis will be blinded and intention-to-treat analysis will be preformed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethical Committee of Uppsala University (DNR: 2017-170) and by the Norwegian ethical board (REC: 2017/1911). The study will be conducted in agreement with the Helsinki declaration. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03311997.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.