Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519672›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Winter cancellations of elective surgical procedures in the UK: a questionnaire survey of patients on the economic and psychological impact.

Philip J J Herrod, Alfred Adiamah, Hannah Boyd-Carson, Prita Daliya, Ahmed M El-Sharkawy, Panchali B Sarmah, Tanvir Hossain, Jennifer Couch, Tanvir S Sian, Andrew Wragg and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. COVID-19 in Women's health: Pre-operative gynaecological assessment and shared decision making.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Impacts of elective surgical cancellations and postponements in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J J HerrodDerby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Alfred AdiamahNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0624-6197
Hannah Boyd-CarsonDerby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Prita DaliyaNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ahmed M El-SharkawyChesterfield Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, UK.
Panchali B SarmahUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Tanvir HossainNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jennifer CouchNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tanvir S SianDerby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Andrew WraggNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David R AndrewUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.
Simon L ParsonsNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dileep N LoboNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK dileep.lobo@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1187-5796
WES-Pi Study Group on behalf of the East Midlands Surgical Academic Network (EMSAN)
WES-Pi Study Group
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Derby Hospital · GBChesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLincoln County Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 19891Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1Versus Arthritis 19891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo quantify the economic and psychological impact of the cancellation of operations due to winter pressures on patients, their families and the economy.

designThis questionnaire study was designed with the help of patient groups. Data were collected on the economic and financial burden of cancellations. Emotions were also quantified on a 5-point Likert scale.

settingFive NHS Hospital Trusts in the East Midlands region of England.

participantsWe identified 796 participants who had their elective operations cancelled between 1 November 2017 and 31 March 2018 and received responses from 339 (43%) participants.

interventionsParticipants were posted a modified version of a validated quality of life questionnaire with a prepaid return envelope.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measures were the financial and psychological impact of the cancellation of elective surgery on patients and their families.

resultsOf the 339 respondents, 163 (48%) were aged <65 years, with 111 (68%) being in employment. Sixty-six (19%) participants had their operations cancelled on the day. Only 69 (62%) of working adults were able to return to work during the time scheduled for their operation, with a mean loss of 5 working days (SD 10). Additional working days were lost subsequently by 60 (54%) participants (mean 7 days (SD 10)). Family members of 111 (33%) participants required additional time off work (mean 5 days (SD 7)). Over 30% of participants reported extreme levels of sadness, disappointment, anger, frustration and stress. At least moderate concern about continued symptoms was reported by 234 (70%) participants, and 193 (59%) participants reported at least moderate concern about their deteriorating condition.

conclusionsThe cancellation of elective surgery during the winter had an adverse impact on patients and the economy, including days of work lost and health-related anxiety. We recommend better planning, and provision of more notice and better support to patients.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesElective Surgical ProceduresSeasonsUtilization ReviewEfficiency, OrganizationalEnglandHospitals, DistrictHumansLinear ModelsNo-Show PatientsOperating RoomsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceeconomic impactelective operationsNational Health Servicepsychosocial impactwinter cancellations

Identifiers

PMID31519672
PMCPMC6747666
OpenAlexW2972482174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.