Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519656›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Pigs through Microbial Modulation via Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Sows and Dietary Supplementation of Inulin in Offspring.

Ursula M McCormack, Tânia Curião, Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli, Toby Wilkinson, Henry Reyer, Fiona Crispie, Paul D Cotter, Christopher J Creevey, Gillian E Gardiner, Peadar G Lawlor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gut health: The results of microbial and mucosal immune interactions in pigs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ursula M McCormack *Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Tânia CuriãoTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5269-0387
Barbara U Metzler-ZebeliDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University Clinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2413-4957
Toby WilkinsonAnimal and Microbial Sciences, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
Henry ReyerLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Christopher J CreeveyAnimal and Microbial Sciences, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
Gillian E Gardiner *Department of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland.
Peadar G LawlorTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland peadar.lawlor@teagasc.ie.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEAberystwyth University · GBResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATWaterford Institute of Technology · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As previous studies have demonstrated a link between the porcine intestinal microbiome and feed efficiency (FE), microbiota manipulation may offer a means of improving FE in pigs. A fecal microbiota transplantation procedure (FMTp), using fecal extracts from highly feed-efficient pigs, was performed in pregnant sows (

Indexed as

Body WeightDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaEnergy MetabolismFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesFemaleInulinPregnancySwineWeaningInulingrowthinoculationintestinal microbiotamicrobial modulationprebioticswine

Identifiers

PMID31519656
PMCPMC6821959
OpenAlexW2972339128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.