Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519459›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2019

Advances and Challenges in Rational Drug Design for SLCs.

Rachel-Ann A Garibsingh, Avner Schlessinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel-Ann A GaribsinghDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Avner SchlessingerDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: avner.schlessinger@mssm.edu.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER THERAPYT32CA078207 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI James J Manfredi · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
Substrate Specificity Determinants in Nutrient Solute Carrier TransportersR01GM108911 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCHLESSINGER, AVNER · 2014 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA078207NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are over 420 human solute carrier (SLC) transporters from 65 families that are expressed ubiquitously in the body. The SLCs mediate the movement of ions, drugs, and metabolites across membranes and their dysfunction has been associated with a variety of diseases, such as diabetes, cancer, and central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Thus, SLCs are emerging as important targets for therapeutic intervention. Recent technological advances in experimental and computational biology allow better characterization of SLC pharmacology. Here we describe recent approaches to modulate SLC transporter function, with an emphasis on the use of computational approaches and computer-aided drug design (CADD) to study nutrient transporters. Finally, we discuss future perspectives in the rational design of SLC drugs.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAmino Acid Transport System ASCHumansLigandsMinor Histocompatibility AntigensModels, MolecularReceptors, SomatostatinSolute Carrier ProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipAmino Acid Transport System ASCLigandsMCHR1 protein, humanMinor Histocompatibility AntigensReceptors, SomatostatinSLC1A4 protein, humanSLC1A5 protein, humanSolute Carrier Proteinscomputer-aided drug designmembrane transporterprotein structure predictionsolute carrierstructure-based drug discovery

Identifiers

PMID31519459
PMCPMC7082830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.