Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31519212›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2019

When the levee breaks: a practical guide to sketching algorithms for processing the flood of genomic data.

Will P M Rowe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. GenCore: Genomic distance estimation using Locally Consistent Parsing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Sequence similarity estimation by random subsequence sketching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genome research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Population structure analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. A k-mer-Based Estimator of the Substitution Rate Between Repetitive Sequences.Algorithms in bioinformatics : ... International Workshop, WABI ..., proceedings. WABI (Workshop) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Creating and Using Minimizer Sketches in Computational Genomics.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. bettercallsal: better calling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The minimizer Jaccard estimator is biased and inconsistent.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  20. Metagenomics: a path to understanding the gut microbiome.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Will P M RoweInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. w.rowe@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-4463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable advances in genomics over the past decade have resulted in vast amounts of data being generated and deposited in global archives. The growth of these archives exceeds our ability to process their content, leading to significant analysis bottlenecks. Sketching algorithms produce small, approximate summaries of data and have shown great utility in tackling this flood of genomic data, while using minimal compute resources. This article reviews the current state of the field, focusing on how the algorithms work and how genomicists can utilize them effectively. References to interactive workbooks for explaining concepts and demonstrating workflows are included at https://github.com/will-rowe/genome-sketching .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsData CompressionGenomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31519212
PMCPMC6744645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.