Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518681›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2019

Using mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models to assess prenatal drug exposure: Thalidomide versus efavirenz as case studies.

Shakir Adeyinka Atoyebi, Rajith K R Rajoli, Ebunoluwa Adejuyigbe, Andrew Owen, Oluseye Bolaji, Marco Siccardi, Adeniyi Olagunju

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Considerations for the Use of Long-Acting and Extended-Release Agents During Pregnancy and Lactation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mechanistic Coupling of a NovelFrontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shakir Adeyinka AtoyebiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Rajith K R RajoliDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ebunoluwa AdejuyigbeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Andrew OwenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Oluseye BolajiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Marco SiccardiDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Adeniyi OlagunjuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: aeolagunju@oauife.edu.ng.
University of Liverpool · GBObafemi Awolowo University · NG

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204776/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternofoetal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models integrating multi-compartmental maternal and foetal units were developed using Simbiology® to estimate prenatal drug exposure. Processes governing drug disposition were described using differential equations with key system and drug-specific parameters. Transplacental drug transfer was modelled as bidirectional passive diffusion and benchmarked against those for thalidomide as a control. Model-predictions for pharmacokinetic parameters during pregnancy were within acceptable ranges for qualification (two-fold difference of clinically-observed values). Predicted foetal exposure to thalidomide was higher than efavirenz, with median (range) foetal-to-maternal plasma ratios of 4.55 (3.06-9.57) for 400 mg thalidomide versus 0.89 (0.73-1.05) for 400 mg efavirenz at third trimester. Model-predictions indicated foetal exposure consistently above 300% of maternal plasma concentration for thalidomide throughout pregnancy, while exposure to efavirenz increased from under 20% at second trimester to above 100% at third trimester. Further qualification of this approach as a tool in evaluating drug exposure and safety during pregnancy is warranted.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAlkynesBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemFemaleFetusHumansIntestinal AbsorptionPermeabilityPlacentaPregnancyThalidomideAlkynesBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemefavirenzThalidomideEfavirenzFetusPBPK modelPregnancyThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID31518681
PMCPMC6853277
OpenAlexW2972966250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.