Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518565›Full record

Observational studyArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020

Subgroups Defined by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Differ in Functional Gain During Acute Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.

Abhishek Jaywant, Joan Toglia, Faith M Gunning, Michael W O'Dell

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek JaywantDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: abj2006@med.cornell.edu.
Joan TogliaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York; School of Health and Natural Sciences, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, New York.
Faith M GunningDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Michael W O'DellDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USPresbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate subgroups of cognitive impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-defined as normal (score of 25-30), mildly impaired (score of 20-24), and moderately impaired (score less than 19)-by determining whether they differ in rehabilitation gain during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

designObservational study. Linear regression models were conducted and predictors included MoCA subgroups and relevant baseline demographic and clinical covariates. Separate models included the cognitive subscale of the FIM instrument as a predictor.

settingInpatient rehabilitation facility of an urban, academic medical center.

participantsInpatients (N=334) with mild-moderate strokes who were administered the MoCA on admission.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresThe mean relative functional gain (mRFG) and mean relative functional efficiency (mRFE, which adjusts for length of stay) on the FIM total.

resultsMoCA subgroups significantly predicted mRFG and mRFE after accounting for age, sex, education, stroke severity, and recurrent vs first stroke. The normal group exhibited greater mRFG and mRFE than the mildly impaired group, while the moderately impaired group had significantly worse mRFG and mRFE than the mildly impaired group. The moderately impaired group had a significantly smaller proportion of individuals who made a clinically meaningful change on the total-FIM than the mildly impaired and normal groups. MoCA subgroups better accounted for mRFG and mRFE than a standard-of-care cognitive assessment (cognitive-FIM).

conclusionsUse of MoCA-defined subgroups can assist providers in predicting functional gain in survivors of stroke being treated in inpatient rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAcademic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedPrognosisRehabilitation CentersSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsBrain infarctionCerebrovascular disordersCognitionNeurological rehabilitationNeuropsychologyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31518565
PMCPMC8075065
OpenAlexW2972509507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.