Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518513›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology2020

Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Drug Discovery.

Hao Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hao ZhuDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey 08102, USA; email: hao.zhu99@rutgers.edu.

Funding

Predictive Computational Acute Toxicity Modeling by Profiling Chemicals With PublR15ES023148 · NIEHS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ CAMDEN · PI ZHU, HAO · 2013 to 2018
$941k
NIEHS NIH HHS R15 ES023148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the massive data sets available for drug candidates, modern drug discovery has advanced to the big data era. Central to this shift is the development of artificial intelligence approaches to implementing innovative modeling based on the dynamic, heterogeneous, and large nature of drug data sets. As a result, recently developed artificial intelligence approaches such as deep learning and relevant modeling studies provide new solutions to efficacy and safety evaluations of drug candidates based on big data modeling and analysis. The resulting models provided deep insights into the continuum from chemical structure to in vitro, in vivo, and clinical outcomes. The relevant novel data mining, curation, and management techniques provided critical support to recent modeling studies. In summary, the new advancement of artificial intelligence in the big data era has paved the road to future rational drug development and optimization, which will have a significant impact on drug discovery procedures and, eventually, public health.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataAnimalsData MiningDeep LearningDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, Theoreticalartificial intelligencebig datacomputer-aided drug discoverydeep learningmachine learningrational drug design

Identifiers

PMID31518513
PMCPMC7010403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.