Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518379›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Cultural differences in the use of acoustic cues for musical emotion experience.

Vishal Midya, Jeffrey Valla, Hymavathy Balasubramanian, Avantika Mathur, Nandini Chatterjee Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vishal MidyaLanguage, Literacy, and Music Laboratory, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6643-5176
Jeffrey VallaLanguage, Literacy, and Music Laboratory, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana, India.
Hymavathy BalasubramanianLanguage, Literacy, and Music Laboratory, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana, India.
Avantika MathurLanguage, Literacy, and Music Laboratory, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana, India.
Nandini Chatterjee SinghLanguage, Literacy, and Music Laboratory, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-5541
National Brain Research Centre · INPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does music penetrate cultural differences with its ability to evoke emotion? The ragas of Hindustani music are specific sequences of notes that elicit various emotions: happy, romantic, devotion, calm, angry, longing, tension and sad. They can be presented in two modes, alaap and gat, which differ in rhythm, but match in tonality. Participants from Indian and Non-Indian cultures (N = 144 and 112, respectively) rated twenty-four pieces of Hindustani ragas on eight dimensions of emotion, in a free response task. Of the 192 between-group comparisons, ratings differed in only 9% of the instances, showing universality across multiple musical emotions. Robust regression analyses and machine learning methods revealed tonality best explained emotion ratings for Indian participants whereas rhythm was the primary predictor in Non-Indian listeners. Our results provide compelling evidence for universality in emotions in the auditory domain in the realm of musical emotion, driven by distinct acoustic features that depend on listeners' cultural backgrounds.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantsCuesCultureEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMusicPitch Perception

Identifiers

PMID31518379
PMCPMC6743780
OpenAlexW2972814062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.