Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518323›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2019

Incorporating Technology Into the iCook 4-H Program, a Cooking Intervention for Adults and Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sarah Colby, Lauren Moret, Melissa D Olfert, Kendra Kattelmann, Lisa Franzen-Castle, Kristin Riggsbee, Magen Payne, Ainsley Ellington, Cary Springer, Chelsea Allison and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Colby *Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-3690
Melissa D OlfertDavis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-3891
Kendra KattelmannHealth and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-2822
Lisa Franzen-CastleCollege of Education and Human Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-0619
Kristin RiggsbeeDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-5504
Magen PayneDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-919X
Ainsley EllingtonDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-4906
Cary SpringerResearch Computing Support, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-360X
Chelsea AllisonDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-1853
Sa'Nealdra WigginsDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-1418
Rochelle ButlerResearch Computing Support, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4144-2852
Douglas MathewsUniversity of New England, Portland, ME, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-3450
Adrienne A WhiteSchool of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2424-7502
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USSouth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of New England · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilies who cook, eat, and play together have been found to have more positive health outcomes. Interventions are needed that effectively increase these health-related behaviors. Technology is often incorporated in health-related interventions but is not always independently assessed.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to describe challenges and facilitators to incorporating technology into the iCook 4-H intervention program.

methodsDyads (n=228) composed of children (mean 9.4, SD 0.7 years old) and an adult primary meal preparer (mean 39.0, SD 8 years) were randomly assigned to a control (n=77) or treatment group (n=151). All treatment group dyads participated in 6 in-person sessions designed to increase families cooking, eating, and playing together. We incorporated Web-based between-session technological components related to the curriculum content throughout the intervention. Assessments were completed by both groups at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 months; they included measured anthropometrics for children, and online surveys about camera and website skill and use for dyads. Session leaders and participants completed open-ended process evaluations after each session about technological components. We computed chi-square analysis for sex differences in technological variables. We tested relationships between video posting frequency and outcomes of interest (cooking frequency, self-efficacy, and skills; dietary intake; and body mass index) with Spearman correlations. Process evaluations and open-ended survey responses were thematically analyzed for beneficial and inhibiting factors, including technological components in the curriculum.

resultsOnly 78.6% (81/103) of children and 68.3% (71/104) of adults reported always being comfortable accessing the internet postintervention. Boys reported being more comfortable than girls with technological tasks (P<.05). Children who posted more videos had a higher level of cooking skills at 4 months postintervention (r=.189, P=.05). Barriers to website usage reported most frequently by children were lack of accessibility, remembering, interactivity, motivation, time, and lack of parental encouragement.

conclusionsIncorporating technological supports, such as cameras and websites, into children's programs may help produce improved outcomes. Identifying barriers to and patterns of technology usage need to be considered when developing future child health promotion interventions.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN54135351; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54135351.

Indexed as

child healthcookinginterventiontechnologyvideos

Identifiers

PMID31518323
PMCPMC6744819
OpenAlexW2946414432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.