Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518311›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2018

Engaging Men in Prenatal Health via eHealth: Findings From a National Survey.

Michael Mackert, Marie Guadagno, Allison Lazard, Erin Donovan, Aaron Rochlen, Alexandra Garcia, Manuel José Damásio, Brittani Crook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael MackertCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-5354
Marie GuadagnoCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-7538
Allison LazardSchool of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2502-2850
Erin DonovanCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-4454
Aaron RochlenDepartment of Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5996-1592
Alexandra GarciaDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-6598
Manuel José DamásioDepartamento de Cinema e comunicação Multimédia, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-2263
Brittani CrookCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-945X
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversidade Lusófona · PTUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy outcomes in the United States rank among the worst of countries with a developed health care system. Although traditional prenatal health primarily focuses on women, promising findings have emerged in international research that suggest the potential of including men in prenatal health interventions in the United States. eHealth apps present a promising avenue to reach new and expectant fathers with crucial parenting knowledge and healthy, supportive behaviors.

objectiveThe aim was to explore the perceived role of men in prenatal health, acceptability of eHealth to positively engage men during pregnancy, and participant-suggested ways of improving a prenatal health app designed for new and expectant fathers.

methodsA nationally representative sample of adult males (N=962) was recruited through an online survey panel. A third-party market research and digital data collection agency managed the recruitment. The sample had a mean age of 30.2 (SD 6.3) years and included both fathers (413/962, 42.9%) and non-fathers (549/962, 57.1%). Nearly 12.0% (115/962) of participants had a partner who was pregnant at the time of the survey.

resultsDespite perceived barriers, such as time constraints, financial burdens, and an unclear role, men believe it is important to be involved in pregnancy health. The majority of participants (770/944, 81.6%) found the site to contain useful and interesting information. Most substantially, more than three-quarters (738/962, 76.7%) of the sample said they would share the site with others who would benefit from the information. Participants recommended the addition of interactive modules, such as a financial planning tool and videos, to make the site stronger.

conclusionsWe explored the use of targeted eHealth to introduce men to prenatal education. Results indicate men are favorable to this intervention. Additional refinement should include interactive tools to further engage men in this important issue. Reaching men at the prenatal phase is an early "teachable moment"-where new/expectant fathers are open to information on how to help their partners have a healthy pregnancy and promote the health of their unborn children. Findings will further inform best practices for engaging men in pregnancy, which is crucial for improving maternal and child health outcomes in the United States.

Indexed as

expectant fathersfatheringhealth communicationprenatal health

Identifiers

PMID31518311
PMCPMC6715069
OpenAlexW2807904164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.