Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518302›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2019

A 4-Week Electronic-Mentoring Employment Intervention for Youth With Physical Disabilities: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sally Lindsay, Elaine Cagliostro, Jennifer Stinson, Joanne Leck

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02522507 (A Peer E-mentoring Intervention to Improve Transition to Employment for Youth With Physical Disabilities), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02522507 nacompletednot on this map

A Peer E-mentoring Intervention to Improve Transition to Employment for Youth With Physical Disabilities

TypeinterventionalSponsorHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalRan2016 to 2020Enrolled44ConditionsCerebral Palsy, Spina Bifida, Juvenile Arthritis, Spinal Cord InjuryArmsEmpowering youth towards employment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sally LindsayDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto and Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5903-290X
Elaine CagliostroBloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-1141
Jennifer StinsonLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-8052
Joanne LeckTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5462-4036
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth with disabilities are more likely to live in poverty and be unemployed compared with youth without disabilities. Such trends are often a result of a lack of support, inaccessible jobs, environmental barriers, and discriminatory attitudes toward people with disabilities. Youth with disabilities also face barriers in accessing vocational preparation programs. One encouraging way that could help address challenges that youth encounter is by providing support through electronic mentoring (e-mentoring).

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a 4-week Web-based peer e-mentoring employment intervention for youth with physical disabilities.

methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate our intervention, Empowering youth towards employment. Participants included youth aged 15 to 25 years who were randomly assigned to an experimental (mentored) or control (nonmentored) group. Our intervention involved having trained youth mentors (ie, near peers who also had a disability) lead Web-based discussion forums while offering peer support and resources, which involved 12 modules (3 topics a week for 4 weeks). Primary outcomes focused on implementation (ie, feasibility and acceptability), whereas secondary outcomes focused on effectiveness (ie, measures of self-determination, career maturity, and social support).

resultsA total of 28 youth (mean age 19.62, SD 3.53; 14/28, 50% female) completed the RCT in 3 intervention groups and 2 control groups (intervention n=18, control n=10). Participants reported satisfaction with the program and that it was feasible and acceptable. Youth's mean engagement level with the program was 6.44 (SD 2.33) for the experimental group and 5.56 (SD 3.53) for controls. Participants in the intervention group did not demonstrate any significant improvements in social support, career maturity, or self-determination compared with those in the control group. No adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThe Empowering youth towards employment e-mentoring intervention needs further testing with a larger sample and different length of formats to understand how it may have an impact on employment outcomes for youth with disabilities.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02522507; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02522507 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77a3T4qrE).

Indexed as

mentoroccupational therapyrehabilitationsocial supportyouth

Identifiers

PMID31518302
PMCPMC6716490
OpenAlexW2916761607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.