Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518288›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2018

Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents With Cancer: Pilot of a Decision Aid for Parents of Children and Adolescents With Cancer.

Catherine Allingham, Lynn Gillam, Maria McCarthy, Margaret Zacharin, Sadunee Jayasuriya, Yves Heloury, Lisa Orme, Michael Sullivan, Michelle Peate, Yasmin Jayasinghe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine AllinghamDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-2246
Lynn GillamMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-5004
Maria McCarthyDepartment of Psychology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-3921
Margaret ZacharinMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-6818
Sadunee JayasuriyaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-037X
Yves HelouryDepartment of Urology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0843-3970
Lisa OrmeChildren's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-6977
Michael SullivanChildren's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8606-5889
Michelle Peate *Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-4688
Yasmin Jayasinghe *Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-9378
Royal Children's Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFuture infertility is a significant concern for survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Children and adolescents may have the opportunity to undergo fertility preservation (FP) procedures (which preserve gonadal tissue or gametes for future use) prior to the cancer treatment. However, the decision is very complex, as it is often made by parents as proxy decision makers at the time of cancer diagnosis, and is time-sensitive (needing to occur before the cancer treatment begins). Furthermore, FP procedures in children and adolescents are experimental and cannot guarantee future fertility. An uninformed decision may result in future decision regret.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of a Web-based FP decision aid (DA) in parents of children and adolescents with cancer and clinicians. Fertility knowledge and decision regret were compared in families who reviewed the DA compared with those who did not.

methodsThe Web-based DA was developed according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. A cross-sectional study of parents of patients with cancer, who discussed fertility, and clinicians at a tertiary children's hospital was undertaken. The acceptability, usability, and feasibility of the DA were assessed using a pre-post survey design. Measures included the validated Decision Regret Scale, a purpose-designed fertility-related knowledge scale, questions regarding satisfaction with the DA, and open-ended responses for additional feedback. Furthermore, clinicians involved in FP were also invited to review the DA.

resultsWe enrolled 34 parents and 11 clinicians in this study. Participants who reviewed the DA (15 parents and 11 clinicians) expressed satisfaction with its content and functionality. Parents reported an improved understanding of cancer treatments, infertility, and FP procedures and did not report greater decision regret after DA review. Most parents (13/15, 86%) would recommend the DA to other parents. All clinicians had a consensus that this was a valid and relevant information source for all involved in fertility care.

conclusionsIt is an international standard of care to discuss the impact of cancer treatment on fertility before cancer treatment. This is the first fertility DA for parents of children and adolescents with cancer and is found to be relevant and acceptable by parents and clinicians. This DA has the potential to help support parents to make informed fertility-related decisions for their children and adolescents. However, future research is needed to assess the impact of the DA on prospective decision making.

Indexed as

adolescentcancerdecision aidfertility preservationpediatricshared decision makingValues Clarification Exercise

Identifiers

PMID31518288
PMCPMC6715396
OpenAlexW2903459568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.