Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518274›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2019

"Call a Teenager… That's What I Do!" - Grandchildren Help Older Adults Use New Technologies: Qualitative Study.

Jennifer Dickman Portz, Christine Fruhauf, Sheana Bull, Rebecca S Boxer, David B Bekelman, Alejandra Casillas, Kathy Gleason, Elizabeth A Bayliss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02713347 (Palliative Care to Improve Quality of Life in CHF and COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02713347 nacompletednot on this map

Palliative Care to Improve Quality of Life in CHF and COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2016 to 2021Enrolled306ConditionsHeart Failure, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Emphysema, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Interstitial Lung DiseaseArmsADAPT Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Dickman PortzDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-3598
Christine FruhaufDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-8339
Sheana BullmHealth Impact Lab, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-326X
Rebecca S BoxerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-616X
David B BekelmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-0922
Alejandra CasillasDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4229-7466
Kathy GleasonInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-9871
Elizabeth A BaylissInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-0670
Kaiser Permanente · USColorado School of Public Health · USColorado State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training in Palliative CareT32AG044296 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STACY M FISCHER, JEAN S KUTNER · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
Social Convoy Palliative Care (Convoy-Pal) Mobile Health for Older Adults with Advanced Heart FailureK76AG059934 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PORTZ, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$892k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059934NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough family technical support seems intuitive, there is very little research exploring this topic.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct a subanalysis of data collected from a large-scale qualitative project regarding older adults' experiences in using health information technology. Specifically, the subanalysis explored older adults' experiences with technology support from family members to inform strategies for promoting older adults' engagement with new health technologies. Although the primary analysis of the original study was theoretically driven, this paper reports results from an inductive, open-coding analysis.

methodsThis is a subanalysis of a major code identified unexpectedly from a qualitative study investigating older adults' use experience of a widespread health technology, the patient portal. A total of 24 older patients (≥65 years) with multiple chronic conditions (Charlson Comorbidity Index >2) participated in focus groups conducted at the patients' primary clinic. While conducting the primary theoretically driven analysis, coders utilized an open-coding approach to ensure important ideas not reflected in the theoretical code book were captured. Open coding resulted in 1 code: family support. This subanalysis further categorized family support by who provided tech support, how tech support was offered, and the opinions of older participants about receiving family tech support.

resultsThe participants were not specifically asked about family support, yet themes around family assistance and encouragement for technology emerged from every focus group. Participants repeatedly mentioned that they called their grandchildren and adult children if they needed help with technology. Participants also reported that family members experienced difficulty when teaching technology use. Family members struggled to explain simple technology tasks and were frustrated by the slow teaching process.

conclusionsThe results suggest that older adults ask their family members, particularly grandchildren, to support them in the use of new technologies. However, family may experience difficulties in providing this support. Older adults will be increasingly expected to use health technologies, and family members may help with tech support. Providers and health systems should consider potential family support and engagement strategies to foster adoption and use among older patients.

Indexed as

eHealthfamily researchhealth technologysocial support

Identifiers

PMID31518274
PMCPMC6715044
OpenAlexW2936364305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.