Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518266›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2019

Care Team Perspectives and Acceptance of Telehealth in Scaling a Home-Based Primary Care Program: Qualitative Study.

Andrzej Kozikowski, Jillian Shotwell, Eve Wool, Jill C Slaboda, Karen A Abrashkin, Karin Rhodes, Kristofer L Smith, Renee Pekmezaris, Gregory J Norman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "There Is Something Very Personal About Seeing Someone's Face": Provider Perceptions of Video Visits in Home-Based Primary Care During COVID-19.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej KozikowskiCenter for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-4364
Jillian ShotwellNorthwell Health Solutions, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-0609
Eve WoolNorthwell Health Solutions, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-4538
Jill C SlabodaWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-6940
Karen A AbrashkinNorthwell Health Solutions, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-8707
Karin RhodesNorthwell Health Solutions, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-9206
Kristofer L SmithNorthwell Health Solutions, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-8937
Renee PekmezarisCenter for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-6489
Gregory J NormanWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-9597
Northwell Health · USHealth Innovations (United States) · USWest Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel and sustainable approaches to optimizing home-based primary care (HBPC) programs are needed to meet the medical needs of a growing number of homebound older adults in the United States. Telehealth may be a viable option for scaling HBPC programs.

objectiveThe purpose of this qualitative study was to gain insight into the perspectives of HBPC staff regarding adopting telehealth technology to increase the reach of HBPC to more homebound patients.

methodsWe collected qualitative data from HBPC staff (ie, physicians, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, care managers, social workers, and medical coordinators) at a practice in the New York metropolitan area through 16 semistructured interviews and three focus groups. Data were analyzed thematically using the template analysis approach with Self-Determination Theory concepts (ie, relatedness, competence, and autonomy) as an analytical lens.

resultsFour broad themes-pros and cons of scaling, technology impact on staff autonomy, technology impact on competence in providing care, and technology impact on the patient-caregiver-provider relationship-and multiple second-level themes emerged from the analysis. Staff acknowledged the need to scale the program without diminishing effective patient-centered care. Participants perceived alerts generated from patients and caregivers using telehealth as potentially increasing burden and necessitating a rapid response from an already busy staff while increasing ambiguity. However, they also noted that telehealth could increase efficiency and enable more informed care provision. Telehealth could enhance the patient-provider relationship by enabling caregivers to be an integral part of the patient's care team. Staff members raised the concern that patients or caregivers might unnecessarily overutilize the technology, and that some home visits are more appropriate in person rather than via telehealth.

conclusionsThese findings suggest the importance of considering the perspectives of medical professionals regarding telehealth adoption. A proactive approach exploring the benefits and concerns professionals perceive in the adoption of health technology within the HBPC program will hopefully facilitate the optimal integration of telehealth innovations.

Indexed as

home-based primary carehomebound patientstelehealth technology

Identifiers

PMID31518266
PMCPMC6716443
OpenAlexW2940917673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.