Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31518039›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2019

Maternal versus artificial rearing shapes the rumen microbiome having minor long-term physiological implications.

Alejandro Belanche, David R Yáñez-Ruiz, Andrew P Detheridge, Gareth W Griffith, Alison H Kingston-Smith, Charles J Newbold

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rumen microbiota-host transcriptome interaction mediates the protective effects ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Article
  17. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro BelancheEstacion Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), Profesor Albareda, 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5880-6021
David R Yáñez-RuizEstacion Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), Profesor Albareda, 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
Andrew P DetheridgeIBERS, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK.
Gareth W GriffithIBERS, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-3745
Alison H Kingston-SmithIBERS, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK.
Charles J NewboldIBERS, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK.
Aberystwyth University · GBEstación Experimental del Zaidín · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/W/10964A01European Regional Development Fund Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing productivity is a key target in ruminant science which requires better understanding of the rumen microbiota. This study investigated how maternal versus artificial rearing shapes the rumen microbiota using 24 sets of triplet lambs. Lambs within each sibling set were randomly assigned to natural rearing on the ewe (NN); ewe colostrum for 24 h followed by artificial milk feeding (NA); and colostrum alternative and artificial milk feeding (AA). Maternal colostrum feeding enhanced VFA production at weaning but not thereafter. At weaning, lambs reared on milk replacer had no rumen protozoa and lower microbial diversity, whereas natural rearing accelerated the rumen microbial development and facilitated the transition to solid diet. Differences in the rumen prokaryotic communities disappear later in life when all lambs were grouped on the same pasture up to 23 weeks of age. However, NN animals retained higher fungal diversity and abundances of Piromyces, Feramyces and Diplodiniinae protozoa as well as higher feed digestibility (+4%) and animal growth (+6.5%) during the grazing period. Nevertheless, no correlations were found between rumen microbiota and productive outcomes. These findings suggest that the early life nutritional intervention determine the initial rumen microbial community, but the persistence of these effects later in life is weak.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMilkAnimalsDietFemaleMaleRumenSheepWeaning

Identifiers

PMID31518039
PMCPMC6899609
OpenAlexW2972601180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.