Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517974›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Model-based Assessment of the Effect of Contact Precautions Applied to Surveillance-detected Carriers of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Long-term Acute Care Hospitals.

Damon J A Toth, Karim Khader, Alexander Beams, Matthew H Samore

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Economic Evaluations of New Antibiotics: The High Potential Value of Reducing Healthcare Transmission Through Decolonization.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Damon J A TothDepartment of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City.
Karim KhaderDepartment of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City.
Alexander BeamsDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Matthew H SamoreDepartment of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City.
University of Utah · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX001240NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000538NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000555NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn intervention that successfully reduced colonization and infection with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in Chicago-area long-term acute-care hospitals included active surveillance and contact precautions. However, the specific effects of contact precautions applied to surveillance-detected carriers on patient-to-patient transmission are unknown, as other, concurrent intervention components or changes in facility patient dynamics also could have affected the observed outcomes.

methodsUsing previously published data from before and after the CPE intervention, we designed a mathematical model with an explicit representation of postintervention surveillance. We estimated preintervention to postintervention changes of 3 parameters: β, the baseline transmission rate excluding contact precaution effects; δb, the rate of a CPE carrier progressing to bacteremia; and δc, the progression rate to nonbacteremia clinical detection.

resultsAssuming that CPE carriers under contact precautions transmit carriage to other patients at half the rate of undetected carriers, the model produced no convincing evidence for a postintervention change in the baseline transmission rate β (+2.1% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -18% to +28%]). The model did find evidence of a postintervention decrease for δb (-41% [95% CI, -60% to -18%]), but not for δc (-7% [95% CI, -28% to +19%]).

conclusionsOur results suggest that contact precautions for surveillance-detected CPE carriers could potentially explain the observed decrease in colonization by itself, even under conservative assumptions for the effectiveness of those precautions for reducing cross-transmission. Other intervention components such as daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing of all patients and hand-hygiene education and adherence monitoring may have contributed primarily to reducing rates of colonized patients progressing to bacteremia.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeAcute DiseaseBacteremiaBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarrier StateChicagoCross InfectionEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHospitalsHumansInfection ControlLong-Term CareModels, TheoreticalBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasescarbapenemaseactive surveillancecarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceaecontact precautionsmathematical modeltransmission

Identifiers

PMID31517974
PMCPMC6761367
OpenAlexW2973042803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.