Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517970›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Healthcare Workers' Strategies for Doffing Personal Protective Equipment.

Jure Baloh, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Kimberly Dukes, Jaqueline Pereira da Silva, Hugh P Salehi, Melissa Ward, Emily E Chasco, Priyadarshini R Pennathur, Loreen Herwaldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Study on Knowledge of Infection Control Practice of Healthcare Workers.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jure BalohDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Heather Schacht ReisingerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Kimberly DukesInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Jaqueline Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Hugh P SalehiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Melissa WardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Emily E ChascoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Priyadarshini R PennathurDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Loreen HerwaldtDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Funding

Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000448NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal protective equipment (PPE) helps protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from pathogens and prevents cross-contamination. PPE effectiveness is often undermined by inappropriate doffing methods. Our knowledge of how HCWs approach doffing PPE in practice is limited. In this qualitative study, we examine HCWs' perspectives about doffing PPE.

methodsThirty participants at a Midwestern academic hospital were recruited and assigned to 1 of 3 doffing simulation scenarios: 3 mask designs (n = 10), 2 gown designs (n = 10), or 2 glove designs (n = 10). Participants were instructed to doff PPE as they would in routine practice. Their performances were video-recorded and reviewed with participants. Semistructured interviews about their doffing approaches were conducted and audio-recorded, then transcribed and thematically analyzed.

resultsThree overarching themes were identified in interviews: doffing strategies, cognitive processes, and barriers and facilitators. Doffing strategies included doffing safely (minimizing self-contamination) and doffing expediently (eg, ripping PPE off). Cognitive processes during doffing largely pertained to tracking contaminated PPE surfaces, examining PPE design cues (eg, straps), or improvising based on prior experience from training or similar PPE designs. Doffing barriers and facilitators typically related to PPE design, such as PPE fit (or lack of it) and fastener type. Some participants also described personal barriers (eg, glasses, long hair); however, some PPE designs helped mitigate these barriers.

conclusionsEfforts to improve HCWs' doffing performance need to address HCWs' preferences for both safety and expediency when using PPE, which has implications for PPE design, training approaches, and hospital policies and procedures.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPersonal Protective EquipmentAdultAgedFemaleGloves, ProtectiveHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHospitalsHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalMaleMiddle AgedProtective ClothingQualitative ResearchRespiratory Protective Devicesdoffinghealthcare workerspersonal protective equipmentstrategies

Identifiers

PMID31517970
PMCPMC6743502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.