Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517875›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Clinical outcomes of comorbid cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: A retrospective, single-center study in Korea.

Jihwan Jeong, Min-Jae Jeong, Kyunghak Choi, Min-Ju Kim, Youngjin Han, Tae-Won Kwon, Yong-Pil Cho

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Profile of Solid Tumor Patients Complicated With Venous Thromboembolism: A 10-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Based on 1482 Cases.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jihwan JeongDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Min-Jae JeongDepartment of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Kyunghak ChoiDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Min-Ju KimDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center.
Youngjin HanDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Tae-Won KwonDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Yong-Pil ChoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Center for Vascular Biology Research · USUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this single-center, retrospective study, we aimed to report the clinical outcomes, among Asian comorbid cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), and compare them with those of VTE patients without cancer.Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 322 consecutive patients-diagnosed with acute VTE involving the leg, pelvis, or lung-were screened for inclusion. Comorbid cancer patients with VTE (n = 135, 41.9%) were included in this study and analyzed in comparison with VTE patients without cancer (n = 187, 58.1%). The study outcomes were the composite incidence of symptomatic and radiologically confirmed recurrence of VTE, or any-cause mortality.The study outcome incidence was 62.2% (n = 84) during a mean follow-up period of 10 months: VTE recurrence in 7 patients and any-cause mortality in 83. Upon multivariate analysis, higher body mass index, diabetes mellitus, cancer stage IV, and radiotherapy were independently associated with study outcome incidence. VTE involving the inferior vena cava (hazard ratio [HR], 12.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-120.80; P = .034), lung cancer (HR, 16.5; 95% CI, 2.32-117.50; P = .005), and use of vitamin K antagonists (HR, 36.4; 95% CI, 3.00-442.70; P = .005) were independent predictors of VTE recurrence. Compared with VTE patients without cancer, the study outcome incidence was significantly higher among comorbid cancer patients with VTE (62.2% vs 7.5%, P < .001), although there was no significant difference in VTE recurrence between the 2 groups (5.2% in patients with cancer vs 3.7% in patients without cancer, P = .531).We found that various cancer-related and patient-related factors were associated with outcomes among comorbid cancer patients with VTE. The composite incidence of VTE recurrence or any-cause mortality was significantly higher among cancer patients with VTE than among VTE patients without cancer.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRecurrenceRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31517875
PMCPMC6750346
OpenAlexW2972333362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.