ArticleMedicine2019
Clinical efficacy of weekly cisplatin for treatment of patients with breast cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study Protocol Titles: Erratum.Medicine · 2020Article
- Osthole resensitizes CD133Aging · 2020Article
- Synergistic or Additive Pharmacological Interactions between Magnoflorine and Cisplatin in Human Cancer Cells of Different Histological Origin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe will investigate the efficacy and safety of weekly cisplatin (WC) for treatment of patients with breast cancer (BC) systematically.
methodsThis study will describe and critically appraise shared decision approaches used in randomized controlled trials of WC for treatment of patients with BC. We will comprehensively search the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from inception through July 1, 2019. We will utilize RevMan V.5.3 software (London, UK) for statistical analysis.
resultsThis study will systematically explore the efficacy and safety of WC for the treatment of patients with BC through evaluating primary outcomes of overall survival, pathological complete response; and secondary outcomes of cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, and toxicities.
conclusionThis study will provide latest evidence of WC for the treatment of patients with BC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019145358.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.