Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517834›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

The effect of folic acid in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuan Wang, Yang Jin, Yao Wang, Li Li, Yanhong Liao, Yun Zhang, Dan Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of vitamins in the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Epi-Drugs in Heart Failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan WangDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing.
Yang JinDepartment of Respiratory, Beijing First Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yao WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou.
Li LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou.
Yanhong LiaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou.
Yun ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou.
Dan YuDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou.
Zhejiang Hospital · CNBeijing Geriatric Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in stroke risk has been investigated, however, the available results are inconclusive and conflicting. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of folic acid in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsBy searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate effect of folic acid supplementation in patients with CVD. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke were summarized; hazard ratios (HR), the relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were also calculated. Fixed effects models were used to combine the data. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials, which involved 47,523 participants, met the inclusion criteria in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

resultsOur meta-analysis showed that cardiovascular patients who received folic acid therapy had significantly decreased risk of stroke (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.94, Pheterogeneity = .347, I = 10.6%) compared with patients who received control treatment. However, no significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.86-1.10, Pheterogeneity = .315, I = 15.4%), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.66-1.15, Pheterogeneity = .567, I = 0) and risk of CHD (RR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.99-1.10, Pheterogeneity = .725, I = 0) were found between the 2 groups.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke in patients with CVD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsFolic AcidHumansVitamin B ComplexFolic AcidVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID31517834
PMCPMC6750242
OpenAlexW2972540171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.