Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517783›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2020

Impact of Donor Hepatitis C Virus on Kidney Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C-positive Recipients in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era: Time to Revise the Kidney Donor Risk Index?

Robert M Cannon, Jayme E Locke, Babak J Orandi, Douglas J Anderson, Eric G Davis, Lina Mackelaite, Hitarth Dave, Mary Eng, Christopher M Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of hope: Analysis of organ quality and availability among deceased HIV-positive donors.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert M CannonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Jayme E LockeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Babak J OrandiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Douglas J AndersonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Eric G DavisHiram C. Polk Jr. MD Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Lina MackelaiteDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Hitarth DaveDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Mary EngHiram C. Polk Jr. MD Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Christopher M JonesHiram C. Polk Jr. MD Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

DEEP SOUTH TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMKL2TR003097 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2019 to 2023
$5.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are traditionally considered to be at risk for poorer survival outcomes, as reflected in the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Modern direct-acting antivirals may modify this risk.

methodsUsing United Network for Organ Sharing data, HCV-infected adult first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2014 to 2017 were examined. Graft and patient survival were compared in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV antibody (Ab)(+) kidneys versus Ab(-) kidneys. Subsequent analysis was performed in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic (RNA positive) versus HCV-naïve kidneys.

resultsThere were 379 recipients each in the matched cohort of recipients of HCV Ab(+) versus HCV Ab(-) kidneys. Despite a higher KDPI (58.2% for HCV Ab[+] versus 38.8% for HCV Ab[-]), 1-year patient and graft survival were similar in the HCV(+) and HCV(-) groups (95.4% and 94.9% versus 97.9% and 96.0%, P = 0.543 and P = 0.834, respectively). There were 200 recipients each in the cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic versus HCV-naïve kidneys, with the KDPI again higher in the HCV-viremic group (56.8% versus 35.2%). Baseline hazard ratios (HRs) for graft failure (HR, 4.69; P = 0.009) and death (HR, 7.60; P = 0.003) were significantly elevated in the viremic group, but crossed 1 at 21 and 24 months, respectively.

conclusionsIn the modern direct-acting antiviral era, calculated likely KDPI overestimates risk kidneys from HCV (+) donors. Donor viremia conveys an early risk which appears to subside over time. These results suggest that it may be time to revise the kidney donor risk index.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsDonor SelectionFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31517783
PMCPMC7083245
OpenAlexW2973119688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.