ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2019
Detection of
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Basis of Müllerian Agenesis Causing Congenital Uterine Factor Infertility-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Evolutionary Restructuring and Systematic Review of theJournal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome: From Radiological Diagnosis to Further Challenges-Review and Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genetic analyses using chromosomal microarray and exome sequencing in fetuses and women with Müllerian duct anomalies.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic variation and molecular profiling of congenital malformations of the female genital tract based on whole-genome sequencing.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Article
- Genetics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: advancements and implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Genome Sequencing and Transcriptome Profiling in Twins Discordant for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of Genetic Causes in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Identification of Copy Number Variants in a Southern Chinese Cohort of Patients with Congenital Scoliosis.Genes · 2021Article
- Studying Müllerian duct anomalies - from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021Review
- Protein-protein interaction network analysis applied to DNA copy number profiling suggests new perspectives on the aetiology of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Review
- Molecular diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing in Saudi autistic children with epilepsy.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to use whole genome sequencing (WGS) help detect STUDY
designThis was a case-parent trios study. Nine unrelated probands, with MRKH syndrome type 1 and their parents were enrolled. The enrollment, sequencing process, establishment of the
resultswe detected 632
conclusionWe identified five
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.