Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517245›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2019

We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory.

Anastasia Kiyonaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anastasia KiyonagaHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-7586-3447

Funding

Network properties and causal mechanisms of distractor-resistant working memoryF32MH111204 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KIYONAGA, ANASTASIA · 2016 to 2019
$175k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH111204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast and diverse literature describes the relationship between working memory and attention. That literature encompasses tests of the interactions between the two functions, comparisons of the processes underlying them, and theoretical formulations of the cognitive constructs. In a recent review, Oberauer (2019) reins in this varied work to create a roadmap for future research. Here, I delineate several additional considerations to guide the evaluation and development of research into working memory and attention. Namely, working memory is a complex construct that can entail many processes and take on several meanings. Research and theory about working memory-and its relation to attention-must consider what particular demands are being tapped, what type of information is being operated on, and what goal is ultimately at stake.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitive ControlWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID31517245
PMCPMC6688547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.