Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517217›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2018

Incidental Counting: Speeded Number Naming Through Finger Movements.

Elena Sixtus, Oliver Lindemann, Martin H Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experience-driven meaning affects lexical choices during language production.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental Number Representations in 2D Space.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena SixtusResearch Group "Motor Control and Cognition", University of Potsdam, DE.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-1484
Oliver LindemannDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL.ORCID 0000-0003-3789-5373
Martin H FischerDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, DE.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-7272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first steps in numerical cognition are usually done in conjunction with fingers. Following the assumption that abstract concepts stay associated with the sensory-motor information that was present during their acquisition and consolidation, mental number representations should always be associated with the respective finger counting components. We tested whether finger movements that imply finger counting actually prime the corresponding number concepts in adults. All participants counted number 1 with their thumb and incremented sequentially to number 5 with their pinky. In the experiment, participants sequentially and repeatedly pressed five buttons from thumb to pinky. Each button press triggered the visual presentation of a random number between 1 and 5 that had to be named aloud, resulting in 20% counting-congruent and 80% counting-incongruent finger-number mappings. Average naming latencies were significantly shorter for congruent than incongruent finger-number combinations. Furthermore, there was a distance effect where primes partly co-activated numerically close target numbers and with decreasing priming for more distant prime-target pairs. Overall, these results provide further evidence that number representations are strongly associated with finger counting experience, making fingers an effective tool for number comprehension.

Indexed as

embodied cognitionfinger countingnumber namingnumerical cognition

Identifiers

PMID31517217
PMCPMC6634563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.