Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517205›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2018

Pupil Mimicry is the Result of Brightness Perception of the Iris and Pupil.

Madou Derksen, Juliette van Alphen, Sander Schaap, Sebastiaan Mathot, Marnix Naber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pupil dilation reflects the social and motion content of faces.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Face-Specific Pupil Contagion in Infants.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Reply to Mathôt and Naber: Neuroimaging shows that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. There is no evidence that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madou DerksenExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, NL.
Juliette van AlphenExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, NL.
Sander SchaapExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, NL.
Sebastiaan MathotDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, NL.
Marnix NaberExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, NL.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent scientific investigations suggest that people automatically mimic each other's pupil sizes during interaction. However, instead of being a social mimicry effect, it could also be the result of brightness perception. When observers look at individuals with dilated pupils, little of the brighter iris is visible, leading to the perception of a relatively low-illuminated eye region. In the current study we tested whether pupil mimicry remains present when pupils and irises are equalized for luminance values across pupil sizes. We tested several stimulus sets, including faces with static pupils that varied in size across images and dynamic pupils that changed in size over time in videos. Results showed that for traditional, not-luminance-equalized videos, participants' pupil sizes adapted to the observed pupils, showing a pattern that is roughly in line with pupil mimicry. However, no such pupil response in line with mimicry was seen for static images (regardless of whether they were equalized for luminance) nor for luminance-equalized videos. These findings suggest that only salient, dynamic stimuli attract enough attention to the luminance in the eye region to evoke a pupillary response. However, although such responses suggest pupil mimicry, the underlying factor is the change in brightness within the eye as a function of pupil size rather than social mimicry.

Indexed as

DilationMimicryPupilVisual Attention

Identifiers

PMID31517205
PMCPMC6634366
OpenAlexW2809309201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.