ArticleJCO precision oncology2019
Expanded analysis of secondary germline findings from matched tumor/normal sequencing identifies additional clinically significant mutations.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01772771 (Molecular Testing for the MD Anderson Cancer Center Personalized Cancer Therapy Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Molecular Testing for the MD Anderson Cancer Center Personalized Cancer Therapy Program
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Testing Utilization: Discrepancies Between Somatic and Germline Results in Patients With Cancer Reviewed at the UW Health Precision Medicine Molecular Tumor Board.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Tumor and Constitutional Sequencing for Neurofibromatosis Type 1.JCO precision oncology · 2022Article
- Lung cancer is also a hereditary disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Integrating Somatic and Germline Next-Generation Sequencing Into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice.JCO precision oncology · 2021Review
- Rate of change in investigational treatment options: An analysis of reports from a large precision oncology decision support effort.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing of Advanced GI Tumors Reveals Individual Treatment Options.JCO precision oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) for tumor molecular profiling can reveal secondary germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (LPV/PV). The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recommends return of secondary results for a subset of 59 genes, but other genes with evidence of clinical utility are emerging. We previously reported that 4.3% of patients who underwent NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes had LPV/PV based on the ACMG list. Here we report the frequency of additional germline cancer-related gene variants and discuss their clinical utility. PATIENTS AND
methodsMatched tumor and germline DNA NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes was performed in a research laboratory on samples from 1000 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors enrolled in a molecular testing protocol (NCT01772771). The frequency of germline LPV/PV in 54 cancer-related genes, beyond the genes in ACMG list, were analyzed.
resultsAmong 1000 patients who underwent tumor/normal DNA sequencing, 46 (4.6%) were found to have a germline LPV/PV in the following genes:
conclusionsBroader genomic testing is likely to identify additional secondary pathogenic germline alterations, some with potential clinical utility for return to patients and their relatives. The recommended genes for which germline results should be returned are continually changing, warranting continued study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.