Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31517034›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2019

Impact of sacubitril/valsartan on echo parameters in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction a prospective evaluation.

Geoffrey Bayard, Antoine Da Costa, Romain Pierrard, Cécile Roméyer-Bouchard, Jean Baptiste Guichard, Karl Isaaz

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Haemodynamic Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Guide to functional mitral regurgitation: a contemporary review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey BayardDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Antoine Da CostaDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Romain PierrardDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Cécile Roméyer-BouchardDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Jean Baptiste GuichardDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Karl IsaazDivision of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Université Jean Monnet · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacubitril/valsartan has been shown to improve mortality and reduce hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Although the physiological action mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan are well described, its effects on left ventricular (LV) remodelling and other echocardiographic (echo) parameters have not been prospectively studied.

objectiveThe aim of this prospective study was to: McMurray et al. (2012) [1] evaluate if sacubitril/valsartan impacts LV remodelling based on echo parameters; Ponikowski et al. (2016) [2] identify the predictive factors of sacubitril/valsartan response or intolerance.

methodsFrom May 2017 to September 2018, 52 HF patients were prospectively enrolled using PARADIGM-HF criteria: Class II, III, or IV HF; ejection fraction (EF) of 40% or less; hospitalized for HF within the previous 12 months. Echo evaluation was performed before initiating sacubitril/valsartan and 3 months after optimal dose adjustment. Based on previous studies, patients with (absolute) improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 5% were considered significant sacubitril/valsartan responders.

resultsThe 52 patients completing the study were characterized by age: 70 ± 10 years; gender: 11women; aetiology: idiopathic in 20 and ischaemic in 32; NYHA Class: II in 17 and III in 35; LVEF: 32 ± 5%; NTProBNP: 1805 ± 1914 pg/mL. The final population comprised 41 pts (79%), as 11 (21%) did not tolerate sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Under sacubitril/valsartan, several echo parameters significantly improved: LVEF from 32.6 ± 5 to 36 ± 6% (

conclusionsIn HFrEF patients, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves LV systolic remodelling, without any significant effects on LV diastolic or RV systolic echo parameters. Sacubitril/valsartan responders exhibit both less severe LV remodelling and less significant mitral regurgitation. Accordingly, sacubitril/valsartan could be used as soon as possible in HFrEF patients in order to limit LV remodelling, while precluding non-response or intolerance.

Indexed as

ARBs, angiotensin receptor blockersARNI, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorsEchocardiographyHeart failureHF, heart failureHFrEF, heart failure with reduced LVEFLVEF, left ventricular ejection fractionRespondersRes, respondersRV, right ventricularSacubitril/valsartanTTE, trans-thoracic echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID31517034
PMCPMC6728827
OpenAlexW2971403573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.