ArticleCureus2019
The Use of Computed Tomography Perfusion on Admission to Predict Outcomes in Surgical and Nonsurgical Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of admission perfusion CT for the prediction of suboptimal outcome following uncomplicated minor traumatic brain injury.Emergency radiology · 2021Article
- Abnormalities on Perfusion CT and Intervention for Intracranial Hypertension in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to investigate if data obtained from a computed tomography (CT) perfusion study on admission could correlate to outcomes for the patient, including the patient's length of stay in the hospital and their initial and final Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), as well as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on discharge. We present an initial subset of patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria: over the age of 18 with mild, moderate, or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients admitted with a diagnosis of TBI had CT perfusion studies performed within 48 hours of admission. GCS, length of stay, mRS, and discharge location were tracked, along with the patient's course of hospitalization. Initial results and discussion on the utility of CT perfusion for predicting outcomes are presented.
methodsPatients exhibiting mild, moderate, or severe TBI were assessed using CT perfusion within 48 hours of admission from January to July 2019 at the Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC). The neurosurgery census and patient records were assessed for progression of outcomes. Data obtained from the perfusion scans were correlated to patient outcomes to evaluate the utility of CT perfusion in predicting outcomes in surgical and nonsurgical TBI patients.
resultsPreliminary data were obtained on six patients exhibiting TBI, ranging from mild to severe. The mean GCS of our patient cohort on admission was eight, with the most common mechanism of injury found to be falls (50%) and motor vehicle accidents (50%). Cerebral blood volume (CBV) seemed to increase with Rankin value (Pearson's correlations coefficient = 0.43 but was statistically insignificant (P = 0.21)). Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was found to be correlated with CBV, and both increased with Rankin score (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.56) but were statistically insignificant (P = 0.27). These results suggest that with a larger sample size, CBV and CBF may be correlated to patient outcome.
conclusionAlthough more data is needed, preliminary results suggest that with larger patient populations, CT perfusion may provide information that can be correlated clinically to patient outcomes. This study shows that CBF and CBV may serve as useful indicators for prognostication of TBI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.