Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516774›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Probiotics and Clostridium Difficile: A Review of Dysbiosis and the Rehabilitation of Gut Microbiota.

Ashish S Kalakuntla, Gouthami Nalakonda, Kashyap Nalakonda, Chandra Varshini Pidikiti, Syed Ali Aasim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Non-invasive treatment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Correlating Antibiotic-Induced Dysbiosis toACS infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of an Endolysin TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Clinical Trials of Probiotic Strains in Selected Disease Entities.International journal of microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. TheFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashish S KalakuntlaGastroenterology, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND.
Gouthami NalakondaGastroenterology, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND.
Kashyap NalakondaGastroenterology, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, IND.
Chandra Varshini PidikitiGastroenterology, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, IND.
Syed Ali AasimAnaesthesiology, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basis of this paper is to address the use of probiotics as a novel approach to help treat the growing problem of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD), particularly, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). Most of the available data regarding probiotics and their usefulness in treating Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was collected and analyzed. Studies showed the effectiveness of probiotics in treating and also preventing CDI, as well as other gastrointestinal conditions such as Helicobacter pylori infection and inflammatory bowel disease. Probiotics also have, based on limited research, a comparatively minimal adverse effect profile and can aid in faster recovery from disease. Extensive research has been done on two organisms, Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces, but further research into other effective organisms are needed. More clinical trials also need to be conducted to better understand the side effect profile, optimal dosage, drug interactions, and long-term effects on gut microbiota.

Indexed as

antibiotic-associated diarrheaclostridium difficile-associated diarrheagut microbiotalactobacillusprobioticssaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID31516774
PMCPMC6721914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.