ArticleCancer biology & medicine2019
Factors associated with upstaging in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma
Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The DCIS-IBC guide board on predicting postoperative upgrading in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical insights from a multicenter study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Article
- Utility of Surgical Axillary Staging in Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Potential Overtreatment of DCIS in Patients with Limited Life Expectancy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- AI analytics can be used as imaging biomarkers for predicting invasive upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A clinical radiomics nomogram preoperatively to predict ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion in women with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ: a preliminary study.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Is conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ risky?NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Influence of rurality on lymph node assessment among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and treated with mastectomy, SEER 2000-2015.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Multiple Microinvasion Foci in Ductal CarcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma
methodsThe present study enrolled 604 patients (cN0M0) with a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS by CNB, who underwent axillary staging between August 2006 and December 2015, at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China). Predictive factors of upstaging were analyzed retrospectively.
resultsOf the 604 patients, 20.03% (
conclusionsFor patients initially diagnosed with DCIS by CNB, larger tumor size on ultrasonography (> 2 cm) and higher BI-RADS category were independent predictive factors of upstaging on final pathology. Thus, axillary staging in patients with smaller tumor sizes and lower BI-RADS category may be omitted, with little downstream risk for upstaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.