Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516731›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2019

Intrauterine lidocaine and naproxen for analgesia during intrauterine device insertion: randomized controlled trial.

Shana M Miles, Katerina Shvartsman, Susan Dunlow

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02769247 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Naproxen for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion

TypeinterventionalSponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterRan2014 to 2016Enrolled160ConditionsContraception, PainArmsNaproxen, Lidocaine, placebo
NCT04963582 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Does LI4 Acupuncture Provide an Effective Analgesia During Intrauterine Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorNigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsIUD Insertion Complication, Acute PainArmsAcupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shana M MilesSecond Medical Group, 243 Curtiss Rd, Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, 71110 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3194-3338
Katerina Shvartsman2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA.
Susan Dunlow3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA.
Community Link · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluates oral naproxen and intrauterine instillation of lidocaine for analgesia with intrauterine device (IUD) placement as compared to placebo.

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients desiring levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD or Copper T380A IUD were randomized into treatment groups. Patients received either oral naproxen 375 mg or placebo approximately 1 h prior to procedure in conjunction with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine or 5 mL of intrauterine saline. The primary outcome was pain with IUD insertion measured on a visual analog scale immediately following the procedure. Prespecified secondary outcomes included physician pain assessment, post procedure analgesia, satisfaction with procedure, satisfaction with IUD, and pain assessment related to IUD type.

resultsFrom June 4, 2014 to October 28, 2016 a total of 160 women desiring Copper T380A or levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device insertion and meeting study criteria were enrolled and randomized in the study. Of these, 157 (78 in the Copper T380A arm, 79 in the levonorgestrel 52 mg) received study treatment medication. There were 39 in naproxen/lidocaine arm, 39 in placebo/lidocaine arm, 40 in naproxen/placebo arm, and 39 in placebo/placebo arm. There were no differences in the mean pain scores for IUD placement between treatment groups (naproxen/lidocaine 3.38 ± 2.49; lidocaine only 2.87 ± 2.13; naproxen only 3.09 ± 2.18; placebo 3.62 ± 2.45). There was no difference in self-medication post procedure or in satisfaction with the procedure and IUD among women in the treatment arms or by type of IUD.

conclusionNaproxen with or without intrauterine lidocaine does not reduce pain with IUD placement. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02769247. Registered May 11, 2016, Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Intrauterine deviceIUDLidocaineNSAIDPain

Identifiers

PMID31516731
PMCPMC6734494
OpenAlexW2972704998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.